A litigation decision-support platform that simulates how jurors respond to competing narratives — so you know where your story breaks, and why.
"A strong case can still fail if the narrative is unstable."
Trial outcomes hinge on how jurors interpret the story — not just legal merit. Most teams never see where their narrative creates doubt until it's too late.
Attorneys lack systematic insight into where a narrative creates resistance. One fragile framing can unravel a well-prepared case under cross-examination or deliberation.
Human mock trials test one narrative at a time, take weeks to schedule, and return moderator summaries — not structured reasoning. Iterating on competing theories is economically out of reach for all but the highest-stakes cases.
JurySim runs simulated jury panels across competing case narratives to surface juror risk before the courtroom. This is not prediction — it is diagnosis.
Where human mock juries return moderator notes, JurySim returns structured per-juror reasoning: what each juror doubted, why they doubted it, which evidence anchored or undermined conviction, and which narrative variant held across the full panel.
Test three theories in the time it takes to schedule one human session.
Upload your case brief, opening statement draft, or competing narrative variants through our secure, legal-grade platform.
AI-modeled juror profiles evaluate each narrative variant across demographic configurations, surfacing patterns of doubt and conviction.
Structured output: narrative advantage, juror concerns, confidence level, and stability diagnostics — delivered in minutes, not weeks.
Which side's framing performs stronger across juror profiles and panel configurations — with quantified stability.
Not just what jurors doubted — but why. Each concern is linked to the specific narrative element that triggered it, across every simulated juror.
High / Medium / Low stability ratings — no false precision, clear strategic guidance tied to real diagnostic evidence.
Repeated runs isolate structural fragility from surface-level framing noise — something a single human session physically cannot do.
Identify narrative risk before the courtroom does.
Confidential & secure. Designed for legal-grade workflows.
Human mock trials test one narrative, take weeks to schedule, and return moderator notes. JurySim tests multiple theories simultaneously, returns structured per-juror reasoning in minutes, and lets you iterate until the framing holds — at 95% less cost.